Tattoo on bottom of foot

I read the jan 16th post about not being able to get a tattoo on the bottom of your feet because the tattoo will not take. but my question is, would there be better chances that the ink would take better to say the arch of your foot vs. the heel or near your toes where you put most your weight. just from looking at my feet its obvious is to where the skin gets most contact with pressure. im just curious, and if that is true, i dont know about laws or just artists hesitation, but would it be possible for me to find an artist that would tattoo me there?

ive been wondering the same thing.. i jsut wanted it as a personal thing just that i would see but everyone seems to think thats weird and ive been hearing that most artists refuse to do it..

I've seen fellas with tats on their feet - the bit you walk on, not the bridge. It was just writting however - "Made in Australia" - it's overtaking thne southern cross!! I know a few people with it - it looks a bit rough, but it does take. The bridge would probably take better as it's there isn't usually callouses or scar tissue on that area. Would caine like a bitch however. >ModernMyth<